nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, No.276 17-21
黄土高原挖方工程坡面降雨侵蚀模拟研究
基金项目(Foundation): 青海省科技计划:极寒环境沥青路面抗滑特性劣化与自然修复关键技术研究(2025-QY-229); 南昌工程学院博士科研启动项目:“盐渍田排水排盐溯源解析与灌排协同调控研究”(2023kyqd005); 江西省水利厅科技项目“江西省中稻主要种植品种的水分利用研究”(202526YBKT23); 青海民族大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目“生物炭对高寒区土壤理化性质的影响”(DCXM-2025-089)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

针对黄土高原重大工程场地挖方坡面降雨侵蚀严重、治理难度大、植被恢复困难、侵蚀治理容易反复等问题,基于2021年延安市羊圈沟流域挖方坡面径流小区14场野外降雨下泥沙监测数据,利用WEPP模型模拟不同工况下挖方坡面侵蚀情况。结果表明,坡面侵蚀量随着坡度的增加先增加后减少,侵蚀量存在极值,对应坡度为临界坡度56°,坡面侵蚀量与坡度关系在0~20°时呈现指数关系,大于30°时呈现开口向下的抛物线关系;坡长与挖方坡面侵蚀量在坡长不大(<40 m)时呈现指数关系,坡面侵蚀量与坡长关系曲线存在上界;降雨强度大更容易造成坡面侵蚀,且侵蚀量与降雨强度线性相关,侵蚀量增加速率与坡度无关,与坡长负相关但不为负;结合挖方工程实际需要,坡度70°左右最佳,坡长建议在2 m左右。研究对重大工程场地挖方作业、挖方坡面侵蚀防治与生态恢复具有实际指导意义。

Abstract:

Addressing severe rainfall erosion on excavated slopes in major engineering sites on the Loess Plateau—characterized by management difficulties, challenging vegetation restoration, and recurring erosion—this study utilized 2021 field monitoring data from 14 rainfall events at runoff plots on excavated slopes in the Yangjuangou watershed of Yan'an City. The Water Erosion Prediction Project(WEPP) model was used to simulate slope erosion under different conditions. Results indicated that: Slope erosion initially increased with slope gradient and then decreased, with an extremum corresponding to a critical slope gradient of 56°. The relationship between slope erosion and gradient was exponential at 0°–20° and parabolic(opening downward) above 30°. For short slope lengths(<40 m), the relationship between slope length and erosion was exponential, with an upper limit to the curve of erosion versus slope length. Higher rainfall intensity caused more significant slope erosion, and the erosion volume was linearly correlated with rainfall intensity. The rate of erosion increase was independent of slope gradient but negatively correlated with slope length, though not to a negative extent. Considering practical excavation needs, a slope gradient of approximately 70° and a slope length of around 2 m were recommended. This study provides practical guidance for earthwork operations, erosion control, and ecological restoration of excavated slopes in major engineering sites.

参考文献

[1]耿文广,诸云强,陈鹏飞.黄土高原逐年土壤侵蚀模数1km栅格数据集(2001-2015)[J].全球变化数据学报(中英文),2022(1):85-92,244.

[2]田小靖.黄土高原流域侵蚀产沙变化及其驱动因素[D].咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2020.

[3]杨兴,谭利平,彭培好,等.雨强和坡度对嵌套砾石工程边坡侵蚀特征的影响[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020(3):101-108.

[4]苏远逸,李鹏,任宗萍,等.坡度对黄土坡面产流产沙过程及水沙关系的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020(2):118-122.

[5]王军,魏飒,刘凤婵,等.坡耕地降雨径流与土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].河北农业科学,2021(4):88-92,101.

[6]王祥,陈炜,黄国鲜,等.长江上游典型丘陵山区坡耕地径流及氮磷碳流失特征[J].环境工程技术学报,2024,14(5):1589-1598.

[7]张座雄,刘兴荣,王之君,等.降雨冲刷下黄土堆填边坡土水参数变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2023(23):75-84.

[8]陈宝魁,陈佳佳,胡思聪,等.海床坡度对地震动特性的影响及其临界值[J].工程力学,2025,42(4):110-120.

[9]徐蝶,赵士杰,蔡雄飞,等.水蚀过程中土壤重金属元素的迁移特征[J].水土保持通报,2022(1):83-92.

[10]林泽雨,何卓名,张巍,等.堆积体骨料比及土壤含水率对其稳定性影响的试验研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2020,40(6):984-991.

[11]REN Z P,PAN J J,LI Z B,et al. The interaction of aeolian sand and slope on runoff and soil loss on a loess slope via simulated rainfall under laboratory conditions[J]. Water,2023,15(5):888.

[12]张洁.紫色土坡面侵蚀细沟水沙时空特征及其响应关系研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2024.

[13]苟俊菲,甘凤玲,刘春红.紫色土坡面细沟形态变化及其对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023(5):61-68,75.

[14]李丹丹.饱和紫色土坡面片蚀—细沟侵蚀演变过程研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2022.

[15]苟嘉皓.干热河谷区典型人工边坡侵蚀沟形态特征及其影响因素研究[D].南充:西华师范大学,2022.

[16]李海强.东北黑土区侵蚀小流域土壤质量空间分异特征及影响因素研究[D].咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2021.

[17]平红卫.北方土石山区坡长对水土流失的影响研究:以长治市山区为例[J].山西水土保持科技,2020(2):17-19,26.

[18]杨婧滢.模拟降雨条件下不同因子对坡面产流产沙的影响研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2024.

[19]明俊男,王泉泉,袁再健,等.基于人工模拟降雨试验的粤北典型牛肝土坡耕地坡面侵蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2025(3):88-96.

[20]王珊珊,吕刚,董亮,等.极端暴雨作用下排土场边坡细沟侵蚀过程模拟研究[J].水土保持研究,2025(4):18-25.

[21]王淮亮,刘凤婵,黄雅茹,等.不同雨强和坡度下华北山前平原开发建设扰动土产流产沙特征[J].温带林业研究,2024,7(3):22-26.

[22]宋淑钧,杨荣,王鸿,等.基于WEPP模型的黄土旱塬区果园生草的水土流失效应评估[J].水土保持研究,2025(5):111-121.

[23]曹一鸣,姬翠翠,裴向军,等.多模型耦合的流域水土流失监测方法研究[J].生态学报,2024,44(14):6037-6052.

[24]赵紫远,方海燕,武亚冰,等.坡形对黑土区坡耕地土壤侵蚀的模型模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2022(6):23-29,40.

[25]TU A G,ZHENG H J,MO M H,et al. Effect of hillslope profile shape on runoff and soil erosion in red soil hilly areas of China using the WEPP model[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2025,655:132914.

[26]AME M A,WEI W,ZHANG S M,et al. The effects of rainfall and terracing–Mulch combinations on soil erosion in a loess hilly area, China:insights from plot simulations and WEPP modeling[J]. Land,2025,14(2):432.

[27]于洋,姜群鸥,王紫璇,等.基于WEPP模型的工程建设中施工便道边坡水土流失特征:以林芝市巴宜区为例[J].水土保持学报,2023(5):31-39,47.

[28]刘超,曹博召,王健,等.基于WEPP模型的工程堆积体不同堆置方式的水土流失效应研究[J].自然灾害学报,2022,31(2):261-270.

[29]王鹏,黄创业,刘灿,等. WEPP模型在生产建设项目水土保持监测中适用性评价:以江苏滨海液化天然气(LNG)项目为例[J].亚热带水土保持,2020(3):20-24.

[30]胡剑汝,饶良懿,申震洲.基于WEPP的砒砂岩坡面复合侵蚀治理生态水文效应评价[J].水土保持学报,2020(2):123-129,238.

[31]CHEN Z X,GUO M M,CHEN Y,et al. Utilizing an 11-year runoff plot dataset to evaluate the regulation of six land management practices on runoff and sediment on Mollisols slopes and the applicability of the WEPP model[J]. Soil&Tillage Research,2025,252:106601.

基本信息:

中图分类号:X171.4;S157.1

引用信息:

[1]段玉辉,吴幽,桑红辉,等.黄土高原挖方工程坡面降雨侵蚀模拟研究[J].海河水利,2026,No.276(02):17-21.

基金信息:

青海省科技计划:极寒环境沥青路面抗滑特性劣化与自然修复关键技术研究(2025-QY-229); 南昌工程学院博士科研启动项目:“盐渍田排水排盐溯源解析与灌排协同调控研究”(2023kyqd005); 江西省水利厅科技项目“江西省中稻主要种植品种的水分利用研究”(202526YBKT23); 青海民族大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目“生物炭对高寒区土壤理化性质的影响”(DCXM-2025-089)

发布时间:

2025-09-10

出版时间:

2025-09-10

网络发布时间:

2025-09-10

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文